Data everywhere, decisions nowhere
You pay hundreds a month for tools and see endless charts and numbers. But not a single tool tells you: should you enter this category or not?
Other tools give you charts. Satlis gives you a complete set of decisions you can act on — from judgment to execution.
Every module outputs an actionable decision, not just reports and suggestions.
Efficiency changes from real sellers using Satlis (ratio metrics only).
You pay hundreds a month for tools and see endless charts and numbers. But not a single tool tells you: should you enter this category or not?
Brand Analytics gives you 42 terms. Your competitors use 700+. In the COSMO and Rufus era, traditional tools miss 94% of real buyer intent.
Manual PPC runs at 56.5% ACoS — budget burned on the wrong traffic entries. You cannot predict which entry will convert and which will just drain spend.
"The real value of AI is not more data — it is fewer decisions you have to make yourself."
Satlis is not a data tool. It is a decision engine. Every module outputs a decision — go / wait / skip — backed by an evidence chain.
Decision first, evidence second, then execute immediately.
Outputs A-to-E category scoring with a go / wait / skip decision. 15-dimension AI scoring: market demand, competition density, new product success rate, review barrier, ad competition pressure, and more.
A pile of BSR data in a spreadsheet. Draw your own conclusions.
Outputs a beatable competitor pool with S/A/B grading. Flags weaknesses one by one: low ratings, no A+ Content, no video, weak brand presence, inflated pricing. Blue ocean — lock on the benchmark. Red ocean — pinpoint the entry gap.
A competitor list sorted by sales volume. No idea who is beatable.
Dual-perspective attack plan — Traffic side: CTR gaps, Frequently Bought Together interception, ad slot gaps, Search Terms blind spots. Operations side: review vulnerabilities, pricing windows, fulfillment weaknesses, content quality gaps. Outputs an actionable first move.
This feature does not exist.
From 20,000 candidate terms, dual testing filters down to precision actionable terms. Test 1: Indexing qualification — is Amazon indexing your ASIN for this term? Test 2: Conversion opportunity — does this term have real conversion potential for your ASIN? Precision is 16.7x that of Brand Analytics.
A keyword list sorted by search volume. No verification, no filtering, no precision.
8-layer campaign architecture — not a flat campaign. Neural network predicts which entry "will convert" vs. "will just burn budget." Bid engine outputs predicted optimal bids (not Amazon's inflated "suggested bid"). From 51,309 raw entries, filters to 3,273 super Search Terms contributing 72% of orders.
"Here is your ACoS. Good luck."
Each step feeds into the next. Skip any link and the chain breaks.
AI intent mining to expand the entry pool.
Verify whether Amazon indexes your ASIN for each term.
Keep only the entries worth spending on.
AI Listing ensures Amazon's algorithm recognizes and captures demand.
8-layer structured Sponsored Products for efficiency.
Cycle-based review, continuously tightening costs.
This is why sellers using fragmented tools keep running in circles — they are optimizing a broken chain.
Same period, AI-driven vs. manual operations — efficiency comparison (ratio metrics only).
Within 30 days, organic daily orders grew 6.4x while ad efficiency doubled — simultaneously.
"Used dual-tested precision terms for ad launch. ROAS hit 5.94 in two weeks. Organic ranking started climbing in week two."
"Switched from manual PPC to the 8-layer campaign architecture. Organic order share reached 72.1%, ACoS dropped from 56% to 27%."
"Category decisions told us to skip 3 categories we were about to enter (all D/E rated). The A-rated category is now our best-performing product line."
Everything needed to run category, listing, ads, and creative in one loop.
Buy decision accuracy first, then buy execution scale — matches the real growth path of Amazon sellers.
Goal: validate the category and Search Terms opportunity first, avoid discovering the wrong direction after heavy investment.
Goal: on a stable order base, grow organic order share while reducing ACoS.
Goal: standardize decision playbooks across stores and teams, reduce efficiency variance.
Focused on what sellers care about most: profit, conversion, organic orders, and sustainable growth.
Traditional tools output data and charts — you have to do the analysis and judgment yourself. Satlis outputs decisions: enter or skip a category, which competitor to target, which Search Terms to invest in, what to fix first in Sponsored Products. Every module delivers an actionable go / wait / skip call, not a pile of numbers to interpret.
Satlis does not make decisions for you. It delivers judgment recommendations backed by an evidence chain. For example, category analysis outputs a blue ocean / red ocean rating with 15-dimension scoring evidence; competitor analysis tells you which competitors are beatable and exactly where their weaknesses are. The final call is still yours, but you no longer spend hours analyzing data to reach a conclusion.
The first test verifies whether Amazon indexes your ASIN under that Search Term (indexing qualification). The second test determines whether that term has real conversion opportunity for your ASIN (conversion judgment). Only terms that pass both tests enter the final precision library, preventing you from wasting ad budget on dead-end entries.
Both. The new product launch path starts from category judgment, through competitor positioning and precision term filtering, to ad launch — helping you lock strategy before listing. The mature ASIN optimization path uses 8-layer campaign architecture and neural network prediction to restructure existing Sponsored Products, lowering ACoS while growing organic order share.
Primarily the US marketplace, with more marketplaces launching continuously. Check the marketplace selector inside the product for current availability.
Sign up and enter the system. Start with a category analysis or competitor analysis to get your first decision. We recommend running the full loop once, then iterating based on results.